Send.co creates branded sites inside Claude as a closed SaaS; Hushdrop publishes from any agent to your own domain, open-source and encrypted.
| Send (send.co) | Hushdrop | |
|---|---|---|
| CLI / agent-native | ✗ | ✓ |
| Renders HTML / sites | ✓ | ✓ |
| Your own custom domain | ~ | ✓ |
| Zero-knowledge encryption | ✗ | ✓ |
| Your branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open-source / self-hosted | ✗ | ✓ |
| Price for the above | paid | free |
Who should use which
Send suits teams that live in Claude and want viewer analytics. Hushdrop wins for ownership: open-source, your infra, zero-knowledge, free custom domains, any agent.
FAQ
Is it really open-source and self-hosted?
Yes — MIT licensed, and it runs on your own Vercel Blob + domain. No third party ever holds your content (it's encrypted client-side) or controls your URL.
Is it zero-knowledge?
Locked drops are AES-256 encrypted in the browser via StatiCrypt before upload. The server stores only ciphertext — never your content or password.