By Max Techera · Open-source (MIT) · Updated June 2026
Compare

Stacktree vs Hushdrop

An honest head-to-head: where each fits, and why Hushdrop wins on open-source + own-infra.

npxnpx hushdrop report.html

Stacktree is a hosted, closed-source MCP publish primitive; Hushdrop is the open-source, self-hosted equivalent.

StacktreeHushdrop
CLI / agent-native
Renders HTML / sites
Your own custom domain~
Zero-knowledge encryption
Your branding
Open-source / self-hosted
Price for the above$8–19/mofree

Who should use which

Use Stacktree if you want a fully managed service and don't mind closed-source hosting + a subscription, and you want per-viewer analytics and zero-ops hosting today.

Use Hushdrop if you want to own the stack — MIT source, your Vercel Blob, your domain, free — with branding built in and the same MCP/CLI ergonomics. Hushdrop's managed tier matches Stacktree's zero-setup start.

FAQ

Is it really open-source and self-hosted?
Yes — MIT licensed, and it runs on your own Vercel Blob + domain. No third party ever holds your content (it's encrypted client-side) or controls your URL.
Is it zero-knowledge?
Locked drops are AES-256 encrypted in the browser via StatiCrypt before upload. The server stores only ciphertext — never your content or password.

Share what your AI builds — securely, on your terms.

Open-source, zero-knowledge, free. Try it in one command:

npx hushdrop report.html --managed